The Lord God Made the Lot! (part 1)

June 13, 2010 § 2 Comments

One of the things that creationists will often say to justify their beliefs in God goes something like this:

“Have you ever looked at a butterfly? Or a the colours on a tropical fish? Have you ever seen a baby being born, or watched as a child takes its first steps? Have you ever looked at a beautiful rose and smelled its perfume? Have you ever bitten into an apple and tasted the amazing sweetness in it? All these amazing things in the world, all the wonder and beauty, and all of it here with us to enjoy it. Doesn’t it prove the existence of God?”

Monarch Butterfly

Monarch Butterfly

I have been offered up all of  these examples and many more from people trying to prove to me that there is a God, and that all things are created by Him. In fact it’s possible that stories of gods came from just such attitudes toward the world, the idyllic paradise we live in all so amazing and beautiful, all created so man could enjoy it.What a lovely picture, all this is just for us!

But one only needs to scratch the surface a bit and these arguments come tumbling down. Let’s look at the above statement and the examples it contains as an example of just how wrong this thinking is.

First, people always use the example of a beautiful butterfly or the colours of a tropical fish to back up their claim. The claim is “the colours we see are very attractive to us, so why else would they be here? Surely a fish or insect can’t appreciate beauty the way we do.” Well, the fact of the matter is these colours have developed over millennia, and not for the benefit of mankind, but for the benefit of propagating their own species. These colours are used to attract a mate, to help animals identify others of their own species, and to warn predators away from them. It is just happenstance that humans see in the right part of the visible light spectrum as to make these iridescent colours so vibrant to us. To a butterfly for instance, a colour in a flower or another butterfly would appear quite differently, due to the fact that they see a different part of the light spectrum to humans. Some tropical fish can detect colours far beyond the visible spectrum we see, so to them much more information can be conveyed in the appearance of another fish than we can see with the naked eye. These colours and the ability to see them have co-evolved, and have proven beneficial to the organism, or have at least not proven harmful.

Secondly, the “miracle” of childbirth is the next bullet in the believer’s arsenal as an example of the existence of God. “Can’t you see just how amazing that baby is? it’s a little human being! Complete with toes and fingers and a little face! Look at the miracle as the baby learns to walk.” This really is an amazingly joyful time in the life of a human being, watching a new life come into the world. It’s packed with emotion and excitement, and people react in such a way that the new life comes into the world into a welcoming environment. We are wired this way. We welcome new lives into our families and have an instinctive and psychological need to look after them. The human animal, though very complex indeed, is still an animal and is self perpetuating and preserving. The “miracle”  is nothing more than humans projecting their emotional selves onto another, firstly in the case of a newborn, then as the toddler grows up. Humans have an innate ability for empathy, we can see what is happening to another person and understand what that must be like. In this case, we project our own emotions onto the child and the parents, imagine the joy and elation they must be feeling. And in times of extremes of emotion, we can lose track of ourselves and come to conclusions that aren’t there. This is not a miracle. This is an example of humans acting and reacting as we should, as we have evolved to.

And thirdly, the example of the rose and the apple. One smells good, one tastes good. “Surely these are on earth for our own enjoyment. Why else would the perfume of a rose be so intoxicating, or the sweetness of an apple be so pleasant to us?” This argument is by far the most misguided one of all, using examples such as the apple and the rose. The fact of the matter is, both the rose and the apple (as well as Ray Comfort’s banana) are man-made, we have selectively bred these plants to be what they are today. Without our interference, the apple would still be a small pithy fruit, difficult to eat and digest, the rose would be a small insignificant flower not unlike the blackberry blossom with very little in the way of smell, and the banana would be seed-riddled, woody and inedible. In fact, the banana  we eat today is cross-bred from a mutant sweet banana and a plantain. We have as a species made changes to almost all the foods we eat, and most of the flowers and plants in our garden, and we have modified them to suit our purposes.

So the argument for God in the natural world of “miracle and wonder” can easily be refuted with some simple research and deduction. The other side that this argument seems to be making is that what world is filled with beauty and harmony and tranquility, that all of God’s creatures live together in balance, each with its own little place. It is a quaint “cottage-garden” view of the world, all thing bright and beautiful, the Lord God made them all.

But of course we all know this is not true at all. The blinkered view of the subjective beauty of the world is to be only seeing a fraction of the picture. There are more things in nature and the enviroment that humans would naturally find objectionable, abhorrent or disgusting than this view can give credit for. In the second part of this blog piece, I will be countering this “cottage-garden” view of the universe with a few examples, to illustrate that not all things are “Bright and Beautiful”.


Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , ,

§ 2 Responses to The Lord God Made the Lot! (part 1)

  • Laura says:

    First of all, I am of the strong opinion that there is nothing beautiful about birth. Perhaps this just stems from my overall dislike of children, but birth is just gross. All those bodily fluids, and the stretch marks, and slicing the vagina for natural birth (or the scars left from a C-section), and the chance of pooping. Maybe I’m just immature, but really, what beauty is there in all of that??

    Of course, you’re very right about this all; people are too quick to simplify nature into something “pretty” rather than bothering to really understand it. There are reasons why that dart frog is bright red, and it isn’t because it’s pleasing to the eye.

    I for onw find it far more fantastic to think about these organisms evolving these traits rather than a creator bestowing them, especailly for the benefit of people. It just makes no sense.

  • seculartopia says:

    Exactly. Saying that such beauty and perfection must come from a divine being actually restricts it’s natural awe to the beholder.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading The Lord God Made the Lot! (part 1) at Atheist Climber.


%d bloggers like this: